Reach
Can important controls still be reached without a mouse?

A targeted review of five representative views, examining keyboard navigation, readability and understandable errors. A practical look at obstacles that affect use.
A screen can look polished while leaving a button unreachable or a message unclear. Difficulties often appear between actions, not just in an element’s colour. Selecting the journeys to review is therefore essential.
We select five views and their associated tasks, then record observed obstacles. Each finding is tied to a context, a possible consequence and a suggested correction. A review session distinguishes quick improvements from matters requiring deeper work.
Can important controls still be reached without a mouse?
Do labels adequately explain the action and its consequences?
Does an error explain what needs to be corrected?
Find the first field without losing the navigation sequence.
Associate each requested detail with a readable instruction.
Distinguish an action in progress from an actually confirmed result.
Select a form, navigation and views that people actually use.
Follow actions by keyboard and record confusing behaviour.
Prioritise improvements and agree the next checks.
No. The deliverable describes the reviewed scope and findings. It does not replace a complete assessment or a regulatory declaration suited to your situation.
The starting scope covers the review and recommendations. Technical changes may be proposed afterwards, with separate scope and approval.